|
“The Road to Dothan: How God’s Will
Finds Us”
Seattle Pacific
University (Chapel), March 30, 2004
The Rev. Dr.
Frank Anthony Spina
[Genesis
37:1-17]
I
like movies. In fact, I like them so much I pay attention to
the credits. As the credits roll, you get an idea of how many
people are actually involved in making a movie. It’s quite
impressive. But there’s another aspect of the credits that I
find fascinating: the listing of minor characters. Unlike main
characters, where the movie character’s name and the name of the
actor or actress are side by side, minor characters are
identified only by role. A sample: (1) Angry Taxi Driver; (2)
Second Reporter in Coffee Shop; (3) Old Woman with Babushka; (4)
Fruit Stand Operator; (5) Cop on Scene; (6) Fat Man in
Elevator. You get the idea. No wonder these folk are called
“bit” players. I suppose the only thing worse than being billed
this way is to be an “extra” in a “cast of thousands,” in which
case not even your role is mentioned.
When I study biblical stories it’s hard for me not to think of
bit characters in the movies. That’s because there are so many
minor roles in the Bible’s narratives. Granted, when we think
of Bible stories we think of the famous people who get star
billing. Even in a day when we can’t count on a great deal of
biblical literacy, most would have some inkling of Adam and Eve,
Cain and Abel, Abraham and Sarah, David and Bath-Sheba, or Peter
and Paul. But if we mention some other names, we draw a blank:
Shiphrah and Puah, Jael and Sisera, Ehud and Eglon, Aquila and
Priscilla. These stump us every time in Bible Trivial Pursuit.
Still, at least these folk have names. What about those that
don’t? How demeaning can you get? Can you imagine bragging to
someone that you are part of a biblical story but your name was
not given? The response would be, “Yeah, right! How did they
list you in the credits? Bystander? Traveler? Servant? Not
very compelling, huh? Talk about undermining self-esteem!
However, it turns out that many nameless characters in biblical
stories have important roles—sometimes decisive ones. Think of
angels, only a few of which ever get names. Yet, being an angel
seems to be a big deal. Then again, Samson’s Momma gets a whole
chapter devoted to her, yet her name is never provided. Jacob
wrestled all night with Someone whose name he demanded to know.
No only was he not told the name, the One with whom he wrestled
changed Jacob’s name to something else! The biblical text only
refers to this strange wrestler as “a man.” Think of the
credits: “Man Who Wrestled with Jacob.”
I
want to talk this morning about one of the Bible’s bit players,
one who makes a fleeting appearance in one of the most famous of
Bible stories: The story of Joseph. We might read this story
over and over, barely noticing this man. No wonder—he only gets
three verses. But, strangely, what he does in these three
verses is, on the one hand, hardly worth mentioning, and, on the
other hand, absolutely crucial.
Remember how the Joseph story begins? Joseph is the next
youngest of Jacob’s twelve sons and one daughter. The story
gets off on a bad foot in terms of family dynamics, for two
reasons. First off, the family business is sheep herding and
Joseph was foolish enough to tell his Dad that his brothers were
not doing a good job. Also, Jacob was partial to Joseph, loving
him more than his other children and giving him a special
garment to express his affection. To put the matter politely,
the brothers were less than pleased. Making matters worse,
Joseph had a couple of dreams which did not require a Freudian
psychologist to interpret—the point of the dreams was that one
day Joseph would be in a position of authority over his entire
family. Naturally, this infuriated the brothers all the more;
in fact, even Jacob was a little put out with Joseph’s second
dream.
One
day the brothers leave home to pasture the flocks in nearby
Shechem. This was a break, actually, because they were so
livid, who knew what might happen if they stayed around home
with their little brat brother? Then, demonstrating that Jacob
may have been one of the dumbest or most insensitive parents
ever, he decides to send Joseph to check up on the brothers and
the sheep. Joseph is no Einstein either, for he goes merrily to
do the errand without a peep of protest.
When Joseph gets to Shechem, his brothers are nowhere to be
found. That’s when our nameless bit player steps onto the
stage. The text is cryptic: “A man found him and, look,
he was wandering in the field.” Since he had not run into his
brothers, Joseph was wandering around looking for them.
Curiously, here he is looking to find someone, but he is himself
found by someone else. By a man. Who is this man? A local
farmer? A merchant? Someone out for a stroll? The text is
silent. He is simply “a man.” Imagine the credits: “Man in
Field in Shechem.”
But
the significance of what this man does is indirectly
proportionate to the ordinary way he is introduced. What does
he do? He asks a question: “What are you looking for?”
Apparently, the “wandering” tipped off the man that Joseph was
at a loss. After all, that’s how we usually use the verb
“wander.” It’s not a verb of purpose and intention, it’s a verb
suggesting aimlessness, frustration, searching. It is, by the
way, the same verb that describes what the people of Israel did
for forty years before they got to the land God had promised
them. More than once I’ve said to friends, “Sorry to be late.
We got lost. We wandered around for an hour before we
stopped to ask for directions.” No one would ever say to a
friend desperate for help, “Don’t worry. I’ll be right there.
I’m going to wander over immediately.” Wandering is
slow, meandering, hap-hazard—it is not precise, direct,
resolute. Joseph is wandering. The man intrudes, “What are you
looking for?”
“I’m looking for my brothers—tell me where they’re pasturing.”
Somehow, Joseph assumes that this man will have a clue about his
brothers’ whereabouts. Why? Who knows? But there’s no one
else to ask. Besides, this man does pose the question. It
turns out the man knows where the brothers are—he had overheard
them say where they were going. So the answer is
straightforward, “They left from here, for I heard them say,
‘Let’s go to Dothan’.” That’s it: one appearance, three verses,
two lines, consisting of nine words. Then he’s gone. We never
hear of or from him again.
So
Joseph goes to Dothan. Now,
Dothan
as a geographical site is about as jazzy as the non-descript man
in this scene. Who ever heard of
Dothan?
The Bible has great places: Jerusalem, Sheba, Samaria, Judea.
But Dothan?
Can you imagine a song, “I left my heart in Dothan?” “It’s a
long way to
Dothan?”
“Born in
Dothan?”
“We’re Marching to
Dothan?”
But in this snippet of the story, we hear of Dothan. And this
“man.” And both made all the difference in the world.
Why? Well, it’s quite simple. Joseph went to Dothan, his still
fuming brothers sold him to a caravan headed for Egypt, he was
sold into slavery in Egypt, later he was imprisoned on trumped
up charges, then became prime minister of agriculture because he
helped the Pharaoh understand two dreams he had, and finally in
that capacity he saved his family from a famine some years
later. This was some outcome for a kid that only figured he was
going to Dothan to see how his brothers were doing with the
family sheep business. That’s a life story right there. But,
in fact, this is only a small part of where this road to Dothan
led.
Consider this. If Joseph had not gone to Dothan, his brothers
would not have sold him into slavery in Egypt, he would not have
been in position to save his family from starvation, his family
would not have stayed in Egypt and thrived, it would not have
grown so much that it seemed a threat to a subsequent Pharaoh
who “knew not Joseph” and therefore enslaved a family that had
now become a people, God would not have saved this people from
the house of bondage with a mighty hand and outstretched arm,
there would have been no Moses and no law given at Sinai, no
Promised Land would have been occupied, no judges would have
emerged, there would have been no kings of Judah and Israel,
there would have been no Exile from which God eventually rescued
the people once again, there would have been no Restoration, no
Judaism, this “People of the Book,” naturally there would have
been no Israel and no Messiah, thus there would have been no
Jesus and no Christianity, there would have been no history of
the synagogue or church, there would have been no Holy Roman
Empire and no Roman Catholic Church, there would have been no
Protestant Reformation and no 18th century
Evangelical Revival in England under John Wesley, which means
there would have been no Holiness Movement in America and
therefore no Free Methodist Church, which means there would be
no Seattle Pacific University, and certainly no chapel service,
and none of us would be here this morning. All this because
some “man” said to a wandering Joseph: “What are you looking
for?” I’m here to tell you that as roles go this one is huge—I
don’t care how fast the man disappeared or how few words he
spoke or what his name was. That was one doozy of a question!
This man took part in what I call a “pattern of providence.” It
does not matter that he was not aware of it or set out to do
it. His question was most likely innocent: “What are you
looking for?” As importantly, Joseph too was involved in this
“pattern of providence.” And he was likely no more conscious of
this than the man was. Even when Joseph had his famous dreams,
which in retrospect were so predictive of his future, we are
never told that God was behind the dreams or that Joseph
believed they had a divine origin. Likewise, when Joseph went
to Dothan and the events affecting him tragically unfolded, you
would have had a tough time telling him that he was fulfilling
God’s will.
Why? Well, he no sooner got to Dothan than he found himself
stuffed into a well. Plus, before the one brother with any
decency had a chance to rescue him, the others sold him
summarily to a caravan headed a long way from his home. It
doesn’t get any better, for he is purchased—purchased, mind
you—by the captain of Pharaoh’s guard. When you’re in a pit,
it’s hard to think that this is the future God has in mind for
you. When you’re bought by a caravan, the words “praise the
Lord” do not come readily to your lips. When an officer buys
you and has complete control of you, you’re not likely to say,
“Isn’t it wonderful the way God works out things for the best.”
Even when Joseph gets a smidgeon of a break, it turns out sour.
This captain, Potiphar by name, was impressed with Joseph and
put him in charge of the household. If you have to be a slave,
you might as well be one with a little responsibility. But in a
flash this situation blew up in Joseph’s face. Because he
spurned the blandishments of Potiphar’s wife, she set him up and
he was jailed. Once more he makes the best of a horrible
situation by being put in charge of the other prisoners—it’s not
much, but it beats the laundry room or the license plate
factory.
Where was God in all this? Here’s how the text answers this
question: God was with Joseph (Gen. 39:2, 21, 23).
That’s it. We’re not told how God was with
Joseph, or even if he was aware of it. Those around him picked
up on something, but it is not clear what they saw: was he
extraordinarily clever, obviously precocious, stunningly
charismatic, or did he glow in the dark? Every other indication
of providence in this story is in retrospect, at least for the
characters involved. In fact, Joseph did not even realize the
point of his earlier dreams until his brothers bowed before him
in Egypt (Gen. 42:9). When God finally takes an active role and
speaks to Joseph’s father Jacob, the main events of the story
have been long since set in motion. To give some idea of the
theological “take” on the story, we have to pay attention to
Joseph’s words on two occasions.
The
first is when he reveals himself to his brothers and announces
that “God sent me before you to preserve life” (Gen. 45:5-8).
The second is when his brothers are afraid of Joseph’s revenge
and the death of their father. That’s when Joseph alleviates
their fear by saying, “What you did you meant for evil, but God
meant it for good” (Gen. 50:20). This is entirely
retrospective. Did Joseph think this in the pit? When the
caravan was packing him up for the journey to Egypt? When he
was on the auction block? When he was thrown into prison
unjustly?
Providence was seen after the fact, not before.
But
let’s not focus so much on Joseph that we lose sight of our
nameless bit character, the man who inserted himself into
Joseph’s life with a seemingly innocuous, “What are you looking
for?” Recall that this man found Joseph. He didn’t even
know he was lost. He was not yet aware that he had to continue
his journey. He had no clue what was in store for him, not
remotely. Even his dreams were of no immediate help. People
were supposed to be bowing down to him; instead, as a slave he
was bowing down to others. This does not seem to be the future
Joseph envisioned when he first had his dreams.
It’s one thing to be found when you know you’re lost.
It’s quite another to be found when you think you know
where you’re going. The man found Joseph and asked him
the simplest of questions. From the perspective of the Bible’s
metastory, that finding and that question changed
Joseph’s life, his family’s life, Egypt’s life, the chosen
people Israel’s life, the history of Judaism and Christianity,
and most of the history of the world. That was some finding
and some question. It could not have been more
innocent. It could not have been more momentous.
There are many different “patterns of providence” in the
biblical narrative. Not all these patterns are like the one
that shows up in the Joseph story. In this case, I like to
refer to the pattern as a “lurking providence.” Sometimes,
though, God shows up and gives explicit instructions, or fires
up a bush, or thunders through a prophet, or hands down a law,
or visits for dinner, or is in a pillar of fire or cloud, or
crawls into a Jewish cradle, or climbs on a Roman cross. There
are many such patterns. But the one manifest in the Joseph
story, I dare say, is the one that most of us encounter most of
the time.
All
we are doing is running some errand, performing some chore,
working on some agenda, planning on some future, preparing for
some eventuality, covering some contingency, exploiting some
skill, indulging some interest, thinking a little ahead.
Metaphorically, we are doing nothing more dramatic than
traveling toward Shechem. But when we get there, we discover
that what we thought we were looking for is not there. Not
always, but very often, we are found in just such a
circumstance. A man finds us. Or a woman. Maybe a parent.
Perhaps a professor. On occasion a friend. Sometimes a
pastor. Possibly, a stranger. A little church, or a large
one. A congenial prayer group. Here we are, happily and
obliviously on our way when we all of a sudden get found—we
didn’t even know we needed to be. And then we get asked the
question, “What are you looking for?” After that, nothing is
the same.
Instead of staying in Shechem, we head for
Dothan. Joseph could not have anticipated what
Dothan
would mean in a million years. A “lurking providence” would
have to unfold, in its own time, in its own way. For Joseph at
the time,
Dothan
was merely where his brothers were. In the end, it was where
Providence was. How could anything be the same any more?
How
does God do this? I have no clue. That’s not my job to know;
nor is it anyone else’s. This isn’t a matter of not knowing
God’s will. God’s will is emphatically knowable. It is this:
Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and
strength. And love your neighbor as yourself.
Everything else depends on who finds you, how you respond
to the question, “What are you looking for?,” and what happens
when you divert from Shechem to
Dothan.
Few of us will encounter the sort of Dothan that Joseph did.
But a “lurking providence” may have much more in store for our
personal Dothans than we could even imagine while we are
wandering around waiting to be found. God is an equal
opportunity lurker. And Dothan is more than one place on a
map. It is Providence waiting to happen.
|